Template talk:Stub-enemy: Difference between revisions
From WikiBound, your community-driven EarthBound/Mother wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Could it be possible for templates like this to also categorize the articles into the stub category by inserting <nowiki><includeonly>[[Category:Stubs]]</includeonly></nowiki> in it? [[User:A|A]] 18:25, 16 January 2011 (MST) | Could it be possible for templates like this to also categorize the articles into the stub category by inserting <nowiki><includeonly>[[Category:Stubs]]</includeonly></nowiki> in it? [[User:A|A]] 18:25, 16 January 2011 (MST) | ||
:I think the point of this was to not clog up the stubs category with a bunch of articles... {{User:Tina/sig}} 18:33, 16 January 2011 (MST) | :I think the point of this was to not clog up the stubs category with a bunch of articles... {{User:Tina/sig}} 18:33, 16 January 2011 (MST) | ||
::Yup. I made the variants so that [[:Category:Stubs]] would only include those stubs that didn't fit any of the stub subcategories and didn't merit a subcategory of their own. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 18:49, 16 January 2011 (MST) | |||
Revision as of 01:49, 17 January 2011
Could it be possible for templates like this to also categorize the articles into the stub category by inserting <includeonly>[[Category:Stubs]]</includeonly> in it? A 18:25, 16 January 2011 (MST)
- I think the point of this was to not clog up the stubs category with a bunch of articles... →Tinā ♫δ 18:33, 16 January 2011 (MST)
- Yup. I made the variants so that Category:Stubs would only include those stubs that didn't fit any of the stub subcategories and didn't merit a subcategory of their own. Miles (talk) 18:49, 16 January 2011 (MST)
