Talk:List of recovery items in Mother 3: Difference between revisions
Starman125 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Starman125 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Honestly, I don't think so. There's no easy way to make it as readable as the Mother lists without the large pictures next to it to help separate them, and a lot of it can be TL/DR. The way we have the lists now makes it much more readable. ESPECIALLY for the EarthBound lists. It turns into a jumbled mess of paragraphs that a lot of people skip over, and there needs to be a balance between readability and relevance. I think a table honestly works better in this situation, though {{tt|eventually|very soon, I hope}} I plan to go back and add locations that you can get the items to the table, so it basically will say mostly the same thing as the Mother lists, just organized differently. [[User:Multus|Multus]] 06:36, 16 December 2011 (EST) | Honestly, I don't think so. There's no easy way to make it as readable as the Mother lists without the large pictures next to it to help separate them, and a lot of it can be TL/DR. The way we have the lists now makes it much more readable. ESPECIALLY for the EarthBound lists. It turns into a jumbled mess of paragraphs that a lot of people skip over, and there needs to be a balance between readability and relevance. I think a table honestly works better in this situation, though {{tt|eventually|very soon, I hope}} I plan to go back and add locations that you can get the items to the table, so it basically will say mostly the same thing as the Mother lists, just organized differently. [[User:Multus|Multus]] 06:36, 16 December 2011 (EST) | ||
:FFFFFFFF--{{tt|alright, whatever.|Think I might have died a bit inside.}}--[[User:Starman125|Starman125]] 11:39, 16 December 2011 (EST) | :FFFFFFFF--{{tt|alright, whatever.|Think I might have died a bit inside.}}--[[User:Starman125|Starman125]] 11:39, 16 December 2011 (EST) | ||
::...Wait. What about using a sortable table? The list is supposed to be sortable, right? And if a table works better for using descriptions... well, you get the idea. So how about it?--[[User:Starman125|Starman125]] 19:05, 16 December 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 00:05, 17 December 2011
Shouldn't there be sections for the in-game descriptions of the items?--Starman125 20:34, 15 December 2011 (EST)
- Same goes for the other items, not just in Mother 3, but in EarthBound and Mother as well.--Starman125 20:39, 15 December 2011 (EST)
Honestly, I don't think so. There's no easy way to make it as readable as the Mother lists without the large pictures next to it to help separate them, and a lot of it can be TL/DR. The way we have the lists now makes it much more readable. ESPECIALLY for the EarthBound lists. It turns into a jumbled mess of paragraphs that a lot of people skip over, and there needs to be a balance between readability and relevance. I think a table honestly works better in this situation, though eventually I plan to go back and add locations that you can get the items to the table, so it basically will say mostly the same thing as the Mother lists, just organized differently. Multus 06:36, 16 December 2011 (EST)
- FFFFFFFF--alright, whatever.--Starman125 11:39, 16 December 2011 (EST)
- ...Wait. What about using a sortable table? The list is supposed to be sortable, right? And if a table works better for using descriptions... well, you get the idea. So how about it?--Starman125 19:05, 16 December 2011 (EST)
